Re: [PATCH] regulator: of: Lower the severity of the error with no container
From: Mark Brown
Date: Thu Oct 09 2014 - 11:55:09 EST
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:25:31PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 01:12:13AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > We'll do something, just a question of what and what the default is.
> Ok. Note that a boot parameter would not work well for our use case,
> so it would be great if we can find something else.
Could you explain why please?
> > Shove a dev_name() on the front if we get a collision? I have to say
> > I've never cared, the debugfs isn't that important so it doesn't matter
> > too much if it fails.
> Sure, but, again, I am getting lots and lots of those error messages.
> I probably would not care either (and probably not even have noticed)
> if not for those messages.
> Want me to submit a patch with the dev_name solution ?
Description: Digital signature