[PATCH] spi: spidev: Use separate TX and RX bounce buffers

From: Ray Jui
Date: Thu Oct 09 2014 - 14:18:59 EST


By using separate TX and RX bounce buffers, we avoid potential cache
flush and invalidation sequence issue that may be encountered when a
single bounce buffer is shared between TX and RX

Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <rjui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: JD (Jiandong) Zheng <jdzheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/spi/spidev.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spidev.c b/drivers/spi/spidev.c
index e3bc23b..e50039f 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spidev.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spidev.c
@@ -82,10 +82,11 @@ struct spidev_data {
struct spi_device *spi;
struct list_head device_entry;

- /* buffer is NULL unless this device is open (users > 0) */
+ /* TX/RX buffers are NULL unless this device is open (users > 0) */
struct mutex buf_lock;
unsigned users;
- u8 *buffer;
+ u8 *tx_buffer;
+ u8 *rx_buffer;
};

static LIST_HEAD(device_list);
@@ -135,7 +136,7 @@ static inline ssize_t
spidev_sync_write(struct spidev_data *spidev, size_t len)
{
struct spi_transfer t = {
- .tx_buf = spidev->buffer,
+ .tx_buf = spidev->tx_buffer,
.len = len,
};
struct spi_message m;
@@ -149,7 +150,7 @@ static inline ssize_t
spidev_sync_read(struct spidev_data *spidev, size_t len)
{
struct spi_transfer t = {
- .rx_buf = spidev->buffer,
+ .rx_buf = spidev->rx_buffer,
.len = len,
};
struct spi_message m;
@@ -179,7 +180,7 @@ spidev_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *f_pos)
if (status > 0) {
unsigned long missing;

- missing = copy_to_user(buf, spidev->buffer, status);
+ missing = copy_to_user(buf, spidev->rx_buffer, status);
if (missing == status)
status = -EFAULT;
else
@@ -206,7 +207,7 @@ spidev_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
spidev = filp->private_data;

mutex_lock(&spidev->buf_lock);
- missing = copy_from_user(spidev->buffer, buf, count);
+ missing = copy_from_user(spidev->tx_buffer, buf, count);
if (missing == 0)
status = spidev_sync_write(spidev, count);
else
@@ -224,7 +225,7 @@ static int spidev_message(struct spidev_data *spidev,
struct spi_transfer *k_tmp;
struct spi_ioc_transfer *u_tmp;
unsigned n, total;
- u8 *buf;
+ u8 *tx_buf, *rx_buf;
int status = -EFAULT;

spi_message_init(&msg);
@@ -236,7 +237,8 @@ static int spidev_message(struct spidev_data *spidev,
* We walk the array of user-provided transfers, using each one
* to initialize a kernel version of the same transfer.
*/
- buf = spidev->buffer;
+ tx_buf = spidev->tx_buffer;
+ rx_buf = spidev->rx_buffer;
total = 0;
for (n = n_xfers, k_tmp = k_xfers, u_tmp = u_xfers;
n;
@@ -250,20 +252,21 @@ static int spidev_message(struct spidev_data *spidev,
}

if (u_tmp->rx_buf) {
- k_tmp->rx_buf = buf;
+ k_tmp->rx_buf = rx_buf;
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, (u8 __user *)
(uintptr_t) u_tmp->rx_buf,
u_tmp->len))
goto done;
}
if (u_tmp->tx_buf) {
- k_tmp->tx_buf = buf;
- if (copy_from_user(buf, (const u8 __user *)
+ k_tmp->tx_buf = tx_buf;
+ if (copy_from_user(tx_buf, (const u8 __user *)
(uintptr_t) u_tmp->tx_buf,
u_tmp->len))
goto done;
}
- buf += k_tmp->len;
+ tx_buf += k_tmp->len;
+ rx_buf += k_tmp->len;

k_tmp->cs_change = !!u_tmp->cs_change;
k_tmp->tx_nbits = u_tmp->tx_nbits;
@@ -290,17 +293,17 @@ static int spidev_message(struct spidev_data *spidev,
goto done;

/* copy any rx data out of bounce buffer */
- buf = spidev->buffer;
+ rx_buf = spidev->rx_buffer;
for (n = n_xfers, u_tmp = u_xfers; n; n--, u_tmp++) {
if (u_tmp->rx_buf) {
if (__copy_to_user((u8 __user *)
- (uintptr_t) u_tmp->rx_buf, buf,
+ (uintptr_t) u_tmp->rx_buf, rx_buf,
u_tmp->len)) {
status = -EFAULT;
goto done;
}
}
- buf += u_tmp->len;
+ rx_buf += u_tmp->len;
}
status = total;

@@ -508,22 +511,41 @@ static int spidev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
break;
}
}
- if (status == 0) {
- if (!spidev->buffer) {
- spidev->buffer = kmalloc(bufsiz, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!spidev->buffer) {
+
+ if (status) {
+ pr_debug("spidev: nothing for minor %d\n", iminor(inode));
+ goto err_find_dev;
+ }
+
+ if (!spidev->tx_buffer) {
+ spidev->tx_buffer = kmalloc(bufsiz, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!spidev->tx_buffer) {
dev_dbg(&spidev->spi->dev, "open/ENOMEM\n");
status = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_find_dev;
}
}
- if (status == 0) {
- spidev->users++;
- filp->private_data = spidev;
- nonseekable_open(inode, filp);
+
+ if (!spidev->rx_buffer) {
+ spidev->rx_buffer = kmalloc(bufsiz, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!spidev->rx_buffer) {
+ dev_dbg(&spidev->spi->dev, "open/ENOMEM\n");
+ status = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_alloc_rx_buf;
}
- } else
- pr_debug("spidev: nothing for minor %d\n", iminor(inode));
+ }
+
+ spidev->users++;
+ filp->private_data = spidev;
+ nonseekable_open(inode, filp);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&device_list_lock);
+ return 0;

+err_alloc_rx_buf:
+ kfree(spidev->tx_buffer);
+ spidev->tx_buffer = NULL;
+err_find_dev:
mutex_unlock(&device_list_lock);
return status;
}
@@ -542,8 +564,11 @@ static int spidev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
if (!spidev->users) {
int dofree;

- kfree(spidev->buffer);
- spidev->buffer = NULL;
+ kfree(spidev->tx_buffer);
+ spidev->tx_buffer = NULL;
+
+ kfree(spidev->rx_buffer);
+ spidev->rx_buffer = NULL;

/* ... after we unbound from the underlying device? */
spin_lock_irq(&spidev->spi_lock);
--
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/