Re: [PATCH v7 6/7] sched: replace capacity_factor by usage

[Vincent Guittot]

On 10 October 2014 09:17, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> yes i think it latter because it give a more stable view of the

s/latter/matter/

> "overload state" and "have  free capacity state" of the CPU.
> One additional point is that the imbalance_pct will ensure that a
> cpu/group will not been seen as having capacity if its available
> capacity is only 1-5% which will generate spurious task migration
>
> I will add these details in the commit log and in a comment in the code
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/