Re: [PATCH 04/10] of: Add Tegra124 EMC bindings
From: Mark Rutland
Date: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 09:14:33 EST
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 01:46:55PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add binding documentation for the nvidia,tegra124-emc device tree node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/memory-controllers/tegra-emc.txt | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/tegra-emc.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/tegra-emc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/tegra-emc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6282c6b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/tegra-emc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> +Tegra124 SoC EMC controller
> +
> +Required properties :
> +- compatible : "nvidia,tegra124-emc".
> +- reg : Should contain 1 entry:
> + - EMC register set
> +
> +The node should contain a "timings@i" subnode for each supported RAM type
> + (see field RAM_CODE in register PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A)
> +Required properties for "timings@i" nodes :
> +- nvidia,ram-code : Should contain the value of RAM_CODE this timing set
> + is used for.
> +
> +Each "timings@i" node should contain "timing@j" subnodes. One "timing@j"
> + node should exist for each supported EMC clock rate.
What do the i and j correspond to?
> +Required properties for "timing@j" nodes :
> +- clock-frequency : Should contain the memory clock rate.
> +- nvidia,parent-clock-frequency : Should contain the rate of the EMC
> + clock's parent clock.
Why are both of these properties necessary?
What is the relationship between the two?
> +- clocks : Must contain an entry for each entry in clock-names.
> + See ../clocks/clock-bindings.txt for details.
> +- clock-names : Must include the following entries:
> + - emc-parent : EMC's parent clock.
Surely the clocks are a property of the EMC, and not the individual
timings?
> +- The following properties contain EMC timing characterization values:
> + - nvidia,emc-zcal-cnt-long
> + - nvidia,emc-auto-cal-interval
> + - nvidia,emc-ctt-term-ctrl
> + - nvidia,emc-cfg
> + - nvidia,emc-cfg-2
> + - nvidia,emc-sel-dpd-ctrl
> + - nvidia,emc-cfg-dig-dll
> + - nvidia,emc-bgbias-ctl0
> + - nvidia,emc-auto-cal-config
> + - nvidia,emc-auto-cal-config2
> + - nvidia,emc-auto-cal-config3
> + - nvidia,emc-mode-reset
> + - nvidia,emc-mode-1
> + - nvidia,emc-mode-2
> + - nvidia,emc-mode-4
> +- nvidia,emc-configuration : EMC timing characterization data written to
> + EMC registers.
I have no idea what any of these are. Perhaps these make sense, but I
cannot tell.
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/