Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH v4 4/5] fuse: Support privileged xattrs only with a mount option
From: Michael j Theall
Date: Tue Oct 14 2014 - 14:12:40 EST
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 10/14/2014 09:25:55 AM:
> From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: fuse-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Serge H. Hallyn"
> <serge.hallyn@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Seth
> Forshee <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Eric W. Biederman"
> <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: 10/14/2014 09:27 AM
> Subject: [fuse-devel] [PATCH v4 4/5] fuse: Support privileged xattrs
> only with a mount option
> Allowing unprivileged users to provide arbitrary xattrs via fuse
> mounts bypasses the normal restrictions on setting xattrs. Such
> mounts should be restricted to reading and writing xattrs in the
> user.* namespace.
Can you explain how the normal restrictions on setting xattrs are
My filesystem still needs security.* and system.*, and it looks like
xattr_permission already prevents non-privileged users from accessing
> It's difficult though to tell whether a mount is being performed
> on behalf of an unprivileged user since fuse mounts are ususally
> done via a suid root helper. Thus a new mount option,
> privileged_xattrs, is added to indicated that xattrs from other
> namespaces are allowed. This option can only be supplied by
> system-wide root; supplying the option as an unprivileged user
> will cause the mount to fail.
I can't say I'm convinced that this is the right direction to head.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/