Re: [PATCH v5] init: Disable defaults if init= fails

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 11:13:14 -0700 Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:05 AM,  <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 09:53:56PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> I significantly prefer default N.  Scripts that play with init= really
> >> don't want the fallback, and I can imagine contexts in which it could
> >> be a security problem.
> >
> > While I certainly would prefer the non-fallback behavior for init as
> > well, standard kernel practice has typically been to use "default y" for
> > previously built-in features that become configurable.  And I'd
> > certainly prefer a compile-time configuration option like this (even
> > with default y) over a "strictinit" kernel command-line option.
> >
> 
> Fair enough.
> 
> So: "default y" for a release or two, then switch the default?  Having
> default y will annoy virtme, though it's not the end of the world.
> Virtme is intended to work with more-or-less-normal kernels.
> 

Adding another Kconfig option is tiresome.  What was wrong with strictinit=?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/