Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/3] virtio-net: Conditionally enable tx interrupt

From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Date: Tue Oct 14 2014 - 17:48:12 EST

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 02:53:27PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 15:16:43 +0800
> > We free old transmitted packets in ndo_start_xmit() currently, so any
> > packet must be orphaned also there. This was used to reduce the overhead of
> > tx interrupt to achieve better performance. But this may not work for some
> > protocols such as TCP stream. TCP depends on the value of sk_wmem_alloc to
> > implement various optimization for small packets stream such as TCP small
> > queue and auto corking. But orphaning packets early in ndo_start_xmit()
> > disable such things more or less since sk_wmem_alloc was not accurate. This
> > lead extra low throughput for TCP stream of small writes.
> >
> > This series tries to solve this issue by enable tx interrupts for all TCP
> > packets other than the ones with push bit or pure ACK. This is done through
> > the support of urgent descriptor which can force an interrupt for a
> > specified packet. If tx interrupt was enabled for a packet, there's no need
> > to orphan it in ndo_start_xmit(), we can free it tx napi which is scheduled
> > by tx interrupt. Then sk_wmem_alloc was more accurate than before and TCP
> > can batch more for small write. More larger skb was produced by TCP in this
> > case to improve both throughput and cpu utilization.
> >
> > Test shows great improvements on small write tcp streams. For most of the
> > other cases, the throughput and cpu utilization are the same in the
> > past. Only few cases, more cpu utilization was noticed which needs more
> > investigation.
> >
> > Review and comments are welcomed.
> I think proper accounting and queueing (at all levels, not just TCP
> sockets) is more important than trying to skim a bunch of cycles by
> avoiding TX interrupts.
> Having an event to free the SKB is absolutely essential for the stack
> to operate correctly.
> And with virtio-net you don't even have the excuse of "the HW
> unfortunately doesn't have an appropriate TX event."
> So please don't play games, and instead use TX interrupts all the
> time. You can mitigate them in various ways, but don't turn them on
> selectively based upon traffic type, that's terrible.

This got me thinking: how about using virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed
for this mitigation?

It's pretty easy to implement - I'll send a proof of concept patch

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at