Re: [PATCH 2/8] power_supply: sysfs: Use power_supply_*() API for accessing function attrs

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Åro, 2014-10-15 at 12:32 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2014-10-14 14:20:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Replace direct calls to power supply function attributes with wrappers.
> > Wrappers provide safe access access in case of unregistering the power
> > supply (.e.g by removing the driver). Replace:
> >  - get_property -> power_supply_get_property
> >  - set_property -> power_supply_set_property
> >  - property_is_writeable -> power_supply_property_is_writeable
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>

Thanks for looking at patches.


> > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static ssize_t power_supply_show_property(struct device *dev,
> >  	if (off == POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TYPE) {
> >  		value.intval = psy->type;
> >  	} else {
> > -		ret = psy->get_property(psy, off, &value);
> > +		ret = power_supply_get_property(psy, off, &value);
> >  
> 
> One thing.. Your power_supply_get_property (and friends) check for psy
> == NULL. Is it neccessary / good idea? As far as I can tell, it should
> not really be NULL...

It is not necessary. I thought it would be a good behavior of such
exported function. You're right that this shouldn't be NULL especially
because previously it was dereferenced.

Other existing power supply exported functions don't check this so maybe
I shouldn't introduce inconsistency.

I'll remove the check and re-spin. I'll found ugly typos in commit
message anyway.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/