Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support

[Darren Hart]

On 10/15/14 17:17, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 03:46:39PM +0100, Darren Hart wrote:

>> Mark, what would you propose we do differently to enable this driver to
>> be firmware-type agnostic?
> 
> For this particular driver, all I'm asking for is that the
> "used-by-rtas" property is not moved over from of_find_property to
> device_get_property. It is irrelevant for all ACPI systems. Evidently my
> comment was unclear; I apologise for that.

So my objection here is that by keeping the of_* terms in the driver we
are required to include of, although it does safely convert to returning
NULL if !CONFIG_OF I suppose.

> We have status = "disabled" as a less specific mechanism for telling the
> OS to ignore a node in DT. I was under the impression that ACPI already
> had a mechanism for marking devices to be ignored, but perhaps I am
> mistaken.

That is correct, in ACPI this would be properly implemented with the
_STA reserved named method. In which case it wouldn't enumerate.

> 
> The concerns I mentioned at the end of my original reply were of a more
> general nature than this particular device description.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/