Re: [PATCH 2/3] checkpatch: Add error on use of attribute((weak)) or __weak

[Joe Perches]

On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 12:42 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:32:08 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Using weak can have unintended link defects.
> > Emit an error on its use.
> 
> Well, we don't want a warning about use of __weak in function
> definitions.  Only in declarations.

Why is that?

> > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > @@ -4671,6 +4671,14 @@ sub process {
> >  			}
> >  		}
> >  
> > +# Check for __attribute__ weak, or __weak (may have link issues)
> > +		if ($realfile !~ m@\binclude/uapi/@ &&
> 
> And this bit maybe is checking for use in a header file, which is not
> as good as checking for a declaration but is probably good enough. 
> However the "uapi" bit is confusing.
> 
> Can we have a better changelog please?

Suggestions?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/