Re: [Patch v2] x86: Make Atom PMC driver configurable.

[Ingo Molnar]

* Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The Atom PMC driver is always built-in, regardless of whether
> the kernel being built is going to be run on an Atom (or even Intel) CPU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: aubrey.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index f2327e88e07c..b4dfd96aeea8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -2485,7 +2485,8 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP
>  	depends on STA2X11
>  
>  config PMC_ATOM
> -	def_bool y
> +	tristate "Intel Atom SOC power management controller driver"
> +	default y
>          depends on PCI
>  

So what I think should happen is to decouple of the 'must work' 
features from the optional debug features in this 'driver': the 
Atom SoC power-off quirk should be made unconditional, as long as 
the .config is Atom-supported (CPU_SUP_INTEL I guess).

All the other bits, such as the debugfs interface, should be in a 
separately and appropriately named config option, 
CONFIG_X86_INTEL_ATOM_PMC_DEBUG=y or so, with 'default n'.

The file should probably be split up, the quirk moved into one of 
the generic quirk files, while pmc_atom.c should have the debugfs 
interface.

That way we don't break anyone and remove the unnecessary code as 
well. It's also a nice clean up.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/