Re: + freezer-check-oom-kill-while-being-frozen.patch added to -mm tree
From: Cong Wang
Date: Thu Oct 16 2014 - 22:34:00 EST
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/16, Cong Wang wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > If a task B is already frozen, it sleeps in D state.
>> >
>> > If OOM selects B as a victim after that, it won't be woken by
>> > SIGKILL, thus it obviously can't call should_thaw_current() and
>> > notice TIF_MEMDIE.
>>
>> I see your point now, it would be more clear if you can just quote
>> the patch instead of changelog.
>>
>> So are you saying the loop in __refrigerator() is useless?
>
> No.
>
>> Since
>> it will always stay in asleep after schedule()?
>
> Not always. But it will stay asleep in this particular case.
Hmm, so we still need to wake it up in oom killer:
if (test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_MEMDIE)) {
if (unlikely(frozen(task)))
wake_up_state(task, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
I will update the patch if Michal doesn't.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/