Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: exynos7: add support for cpuidle core power down
From: Chander Kashyap
Date: Fri Oct 17 2014 - 05:44:07 EST
Hi Lorenzo,
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 07:35:20AM +0100, Chander Kashyap wrote:
>> Exynos7 has core power down state where cores can be powered off independently.
>> This patch adds support for this state.
>
> Please tell us more about the idle-state values you are adding, in particular
> entry, exit latencies and min-residency values.
Entry latency: This value is calculated as follows:
On entry to arm64_enter_idle_state:
timestamp1 = ktimeget();
after returning from cpu_suspend()
timestamp2 = ktimeget();
latency = timestamp2-timestamp1;
Cpu is not allowed to enter core powerdown by skipping wfi instruction at end.
Hence calculated time contains entry time + failure exit time.
Regarding
exit-latency and target-residency time, got these values from HW team.
I am using these as initial values and I will be working on optimizing
these values with further experiments.
If you could suggest any formal method of deriving these values, i can
try those methods as well.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> This patch has following dependencies:
>> - [PATCH v5 0/8] arch: arm64: Enable support for Samsung Exynos7 SoC
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg37047.html
>> - [PATCH v9 0/8] ARM generic idle states
>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/49224
>
> Series above was merged, so dependency is stale.
i will remove this
>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)dont
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi
>> index ce221ac..8e0a034 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi
>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>> device_type = "cpu";
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a57", "arm,armv8";
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP>;
>
> I would add cpu-idle-states phandle after the reg property, as defined
> in the idle states bindings.
i will move this after reg property.
>
>> reg = <0x0>;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@
>> device_type = "cpu";
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a57", "arm,armv8";
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP>;
>> reg = <0x1>;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -50,6 +52,7 @@
>> device_type = "cpu";
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a57", "arm,armv8";
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP>;
>> reg = <0x2>;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -57,8 +60,23 @@
>> device_type = "cpu";
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a57", "arm,armv8";
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP>;
>> reg = <0x3>;
>> };
>> +
>> + idle-states {
>> + entry-method = "arm,psci";
>> +
>> + CPU_SLEEP: cpu-sleep {
>> + compatible = "arm,idle-state";
>> + local-timer-stop;
>> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x0010000>;
>> + entry-latency-us = <20>;
>> + exit-latency-us = <150>;
>> + min-residency-us = <2100>;
>> + status = "enabled";
>
> status ? This is not a documented property. If you need it please explain
> why, define its bindings and we can see how to accommodate it.
I will add okay for status property. As per the bindings posted by you.
regards,
>
> Thank you,
> Lorenzo
>
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> psci {
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/