Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: EXYNOS: Call regulator core suspend prepare and finish functions

From: Doug Anderson
Date: Mon Oct 20 2014 - 12:26:19 EST


Javier,

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The regulator framework has a set of helpers functions to be used when
> the system is entering and leaving from suspend but these are not called
> on Exynos platforms. This means that the .set_suspend_* function handlers
> defined by regulator drivers are not called when the system is suspended.
>
> Suggested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> index cc8d237..ee9a8e0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> #include <asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h>
> @@ -443,6 +444,22 @@ static int exynos_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t state)
>
> static int exynos_suspend_prepare(void)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * REVISIT: It would be better if struct platform_suspend_ops
> + * .prepare handler get the suspend_state_t as a parameter to
> + * avoid hard-coding the suspend to mem state. It's safe to do
> + * it now only because the suspend_valid_only_mem function is
> + * used as the .valid callback used to check if a given state
> + * is supported by the platform anyways.
> + */
> + ret = regulator_suspend_prepare(PM_SUSPEND_MEM);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("Failed to prepare regulators for system suspend\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> s3c_pm_check_prepare();
>
> return 0;
> @@ -451,6 +468,7 @@ static int exynos_suspend_prepare(void)
> static void exynos_suspend_finish(void)
> {
> s3c_pm_check_cleanup();
> + regulator_suspend_finish();

It turns out that regulator_suspend_finish() actually returns an error
code. Could you print a warning if you see it?

Other than that, feel free to add my Reviewed-by. Thanks!

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/