Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] power-domain: add power domain drivers for Rockchip platform

[Kevin Hilman]

"jinkun.hong" <jinkun.hong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: "jinkun.hong" <jinkun.hong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add power domain drivers based on generic power domain for Rockchip platform,
> and support RK3288.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jack Dai <jack.dai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: jinkun.hong <jinkun.hong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[...]

> +static int rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request(struct rockchip_domain *pd,
> +					 bool idle)
> +{
> +	u32 idle_mask = BIT(pd->idle_shift);
> +	u32 idle_target = idle << (pd->idle_shift);
> +	u32 ack_mask = BIT(pd->ack_shift);
> +	u32 ack_target = idle << (pd->ack_shift);
> +	unsigned int mask = BIT(pd->req_shift);
> +	unsigned int val;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&pd->idle_lock, flags);
> +	val = (idle) ? mask : 0;
> +	regmap_update_bits(pd->regmap_pmu, REQ_OFFSET, mask, val);
> +	dsb();

A summary of the locking and barriers here (or in changelog) would be
helpful for reviewers to verify you're protecting what you need to
protect.

> +	do {
> +		regmap_read(pd->regmap_pmu, ACK_OFFSET, &val);
> +	} while ((val & ack_mask) != ack_target);
> +
> +	do {
> +		regmap_read(pd->regmap_pmu, IDLE_OFFSET, &val);
> +	} while ((val & idle_mask) != idle_target);
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pd->idle_lock, flags);

These IRQ-disabled while loops look like opportunities to lockup the
system.  Maybe add a timeout or a maximum number of tries?

> +	return 0;
> +}

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/