Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: Support compiling out sendfile
From: josh
Date: Mon Oct 20 2014 - 18:24:36 EST
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:48:37PM +0200, Pieter Smith wrote:
> Many embedded systems will not need this syscall, and omitting it
> saves space. Add a new EXPERT config option CONFIG_SENDFILE_SYSCALL
> (default y) to support compiling it out.
Nice work, thanks!
If there are no objections, and nobody has a tree they'd rather carry
this through, I'll take the series through the tiny tree when it's ready
to merge.
> bloat-o-meter:
> add/remove: 0/4 grow/shrink: 5/0 up/down: 23/-751 (-728)
> function old new delta
> sys_pwritev 115 122 +7
> sys_preadv 115 122 +7
> fdput_pos 29 36 +7
> sys_pwrite64 115 116 +1
> sys_pread64 115 116 +1
> fdput 11 - -11
> sys_sendfile 122 - -122
> sys_sendfile64 126 - -126
> do_sendfile 492 - -492
Interesting inlining decisions by GCC here. Got a bloat-o-meter for the
two-patch series, by any chance? (Also, is this with tinyconfig? In
particular, with OPTIMIZE_INLINING and OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE?) I'm
wondering if moving sendfile to a separate file made GCC put fdput
out-of-line, and compiling it out reversed that again.
> Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith <pieter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/Makefile | 3 ++-
> init/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
> kernel/sys_ni.c | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/Makefile b/fs/Makefile
> index 1e3423f..1bbfea7 100644
> --- a/fs/Makefile
> +++ b/fs/Makefile
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> # Rewritten to use lists instead of if-statements.
> #
>
> -obj-y := open.o read_write.o sendfile.o file_table.o super.o \
> +obj-y := open.o read_write.o file_table.o super.o \
> char_dev.o stat.o exec.o pipe.o namei.o fcntl.o \
> ioctl.o readdir.o select.o dcache.o inode.o \
> attr.o bad_inode.o file.o filesystems.o namespace.o \
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF) += compat_binfmt_elf.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_FDPIC) += binfmt_elf_fdpic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_BINFMT_SOM) += binfmt_som.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_BINFMT_FLAT) += binfmt_flat.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SENDFILE_SYSCALL) += sendfile.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_FS_MBCACHE) += mbcache.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL) += posix_acl.o
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index 782a65b..df6785c 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1547,6 +1547,16 @@ config ADVISE_SYSCALLS
> applications use these syscalls, you can disable this option to save
> space.
>
> +config SENDFILE_SYSCALL
> + bool "Enable sendfile syscall" if EXPERT
> + default y
> + help
> + This option enables the sendfile syscall, used by applications to copy
> + data between file descriptors. Because sendfile performs the copying
> + within the kernel, it is more efficient than the combination of read
> + and write. If building an embedded system where no applications use
> + the sendfile syscall, you can disable this option to save space.
> +
I'm thinking of adding a submenu to group config FOO_SYSCALL options. :)
I'll probably push that as part of the 3.19 merge window, as a patch on
top of all of the individual tinification options.
> config PCI_QUIRKS
> default y
> bool "Enable PCI quirk workarounds" if EXPERT
> diff --git a/kernel/sys_ni.c b/kernel/sys_ni.c
> index d4709d4..b068de7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sys_ni.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys_ni.c
> @@ -159,6 +159,10 @@ cond_syscall(sys_uselib);
> cond_syscall(sys_fadvise64);
> cond_syscall(sys_fadvise64_64);
> cond_syscall(sys_madvise);
> +cond_syscall(sys_sendfile);
> +cond_syscall(sys_sendfile64);
> +cond_syscall(compat_sys_sendfile);
> +cond_syscall(compat_sys_sendfile64);
>
> /* arch-specific weak syscall entries */
> cond_syscall(sys_pciconfig_read);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/