Re: [PATCH 4/4] PM: convert do_each_thread to for_each_process_thread

[Michal Hocko]

On Tue 21-10-14 14:10:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 09:27:15 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > as per 0c740d0afc3b (introduce for_each_thread() to replace the buggy
> > while_each_thread()) get rid of do_each_thread { } while_each_thread()
> > construct and replace it by a more error prone for_each_thread.
> > 
> > This patch doesn't introduce any user visible change.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> 
> ACK
> 
> Or do you want me to handle this series?

I don't know, I hoped either you or Andrew to pick it up.

> > ---
> >  kernel/power/process.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c
> > index a397fa161d11..7fd7b72554fe 100644
> > --- a/kernel/power/process.c
> > +++ b/kernel/power/process.c
> > @@ -46,13 +46,13 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool user_only)
> >  	while (true) {
> >  		todo = 0;
> >  		read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> > -		do_each_thread(g, p) {
> > +		for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> >  			if (p == current || !freeze_task(p))
> >  				continue;
> >  
> >  			if (!freezer_should_skip(p))
> >  				todo++;
> > -		} while_each_thread(g, p);
> > +		}
> >  		read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> >  
> >  		if (!user_only) {
> > @@ -93,11 +93,11 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool user_only)
> >  
> >  		if (!wakeup) {
> >  			read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> > -			do_each_thread(g, p) {
> > +			for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> >  				if (p != current && !freezer_should_skip(p)
> >  				    && freezing(p) && !frozen(p))
> >  					sched_show_task(p);
> > -			} while_each_thread(g, p);
> > +			}
> >  			read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> >  		}
> >  	} else {
> > @@ -219,11 +219,11 @@ void thaw_processes(void)
> >  	thaw_workqueues();
> >  
> >  	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> > -	do_each_thread(g, p) {
> > +	for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> >  		/* No other threads should have PF_SUSPEND_TASK set */
> >  		WARN_ON((p != curr) && (p->flags & PF_SUSPEND_TASK));
> >  		__thaw_task(p);
> > -	} while_each_thread(g, p);
> > +	}
> >  	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> >  
> >  	WARN_ON(!(curr->flags & PF_SUSPEND_TASK));
> > @@ -246,10 +246,10 @@ void thaw_kernel_threads(void)
> >  	thaw_workqueues();
> >  
> >  	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> > -	do_each_thread(g, p) {
> > +	for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> >  		if (p->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_WQ_WORKER))
> >  			__thaw_task(p);
> > -	} while_each_thread(g, p);
> > +	}
> >  	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> >  
> >  	schedule();
> > 
> 
> -- 
> I speak only for myself.
> Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/