Re: [PATCH v2] x86, e820: panic on sanitizing invalid memory map

[Martin Kelly]

On 10/21/2014 01:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> This patch changes the behavior so that sanitize_e820_map is a void
>> function. When the provided memory map has length 1 or it is sanitized
>> (both ok cases), it returns nothing. If the provided memory map is
>> invalid, then it panics.
> 
> So you break wilfully default_machine_specific_memory_setup() and
> probably some other places. Are you sure about that?
> 

I was concerned about exactly that kind of breakage, so my first patch
merely separated out the return values and added some appropriate error
checking:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/13/514

I then asked whether there are valid cases for ignoring an invalid map
and continuing on, but I didn't receive a reply, so I took my best
guess. It appears I missed some fallback code
(default_machine_specific_memory_setup). That said, most cases don't
appear to have fallback code and will hit issues later on if the BIOS
map is invalid (e.g. Xen).

Thomas, do you see any issues with a revision that separates out the
return values (0 for a map with 1 entry, -1 for a map with invalid
entries) and adds checks in the callers, where appropriate?

Thanks,
Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/