Re: [PATCH v2] x86, e820: panic on sanitizing invalid memory map

[Martin Kelly]

On 10/21/2014 12:44 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Martin Kelly wrote:
>> On 10/21/2014 01:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Thomas, do you see any issues with a revision that separates out the
>> return values (0 for a map with 1 entry, -1 for a map with invalid
>> entries) and adds checks in the callers, where appropriate?
> 
> I think that's a sane approach.
> 

Alright, I will work on a new patch doing that, separating out each call
site (and relevant error handling) into its own patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/