Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling

[Chai Wen]

On 10/22/2014 06:47 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 09:21:46AM +0100, chai wen wrote:
>> Idx sanity check was once implemented separately in these counter handling
>> functions and then return value was treated as a judgement.
>> 	armv7_pmnc_select_counter()
>> 	armv7_pmnc_enable_counter()
>> 	armv7_pmnc_disable_counter()
>> 	armv7_pmnc_enable_intens()
>> 	armv7_pmnc_disable_intens()
>> But we do not need to do this now, and the return of idx is useless.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: chai wen <chaiw.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> It looks like the validation was moved out of all of these functions in
> 7279adbd9bb8ef8f (ARM: perf: check ARMv7 counter validity on a per-pmu
> basis), and we just missed the opportunity to simplify callers at the
> time.
> 
> It would be nice if we mentioned that in the commit message -- it takes
> a while to figure out and it's handy for reference.
> 


Yeah, sorry for forgetting to point out that.

>> ---
>>  arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c |   32 ++++++++++++++------------------
>>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
>> index 116758b..f66a9b8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
>> @@ -564,13 +564,11 @@ static inline int armv7_pmnc_counter_has_overflowed(u32 pmnc, int idx)
>>  	return pmnc & BIT(ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx));
>>  }
>>  
>> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_select_counter(int idx)
>> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_select_counter(int idx)
>>  {
>>  	u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
>>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 5" : : "r" (counter));
>>  	isb();
>> -
>> -	return idx;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline u32 armv7pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
>> @@ -585,8 +583,10 @@ static inline u32 armv7pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
>>  			smp_processor_id(), idx);
>>  	else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER)
>>  		asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : "=r" (value));
>> -	else if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx)
>> +	else {
>> +		armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx);
>>  		asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : "=r" (value));
>> +	}
> 
> Please make the braces consistent -- if one branch in an if .. else
> chain needs them, they all do (see Documentation/CodingStyle).
> 
>>  
>>  	return value;
>>  }
>> @@ -602,40 +602,38 @@ static inline void armv7pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u32 value)
>>  			smp_processor_id(), idx);
>>  	else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER)
>>  		asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : : "r" (value));
>> -	else if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx)
>> +	else {
>> +		armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx);
>>  		asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : : "r" (value));
>> +	}
> 
> Likewise here.
> 
> Otherwise this looks like a nice cleanup to me, so with those changes:
> 
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>


Thanks for your review. I'll send a update version later.

thanks
chai wen

> 
> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline void armv7_pmnc_write_evtsel(int idx, u32 val)
>>  {
>> -	if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx) {
>> -		val &= ARMV7_EVTYPE_MASK;
>> -		asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 1" : : "r" (val));
>> -	}
>> +	armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx);
>> +	val &= ARMV7_EVTYPE_MASK;
>> +	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 1" : : "r" (val));
>>  }
>>  
>> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_enable_counter(int idx)
>> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_enable_counter(int idx)
>>  {
>>  	u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
>>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 1" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
>> -	return idx;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(int idx)
>> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(int idx)
>>  {
>>  	u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
>>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 2" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
>> -	return idx;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_enable_intens(int idx)
>> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_enable_intens(int idx)
>>  {
>>  	u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
>>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c14, 1" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
>> -	return idx;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx)
>> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx)
>>  {
>>  	u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
>>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c14, 2" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
>> @@ -643,8 +641,6 @@ static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx)
>>  	/* Clear the overflow flag in case an interrupt is pending. */
>>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 3" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
>>  	isb();
>> -
>> -	return idx;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline u32 armv7_pmnc_getreset_flags(void)
>> -- 
>> 1.7.1
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>
> .
> 



-- 
Regards

Chai Wen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/