Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Another go at speculative page faults

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:23:40PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > My Ivy Bridge EP (2*10*2) has a ~58% improvement in pagefault throughput:
> > > 
> > > PRE:
> > >        149,441,555      page-faults                  ( +-  1.25% )
> > >
> > > POST:
> > >        236,442,626      page-faults                  ( +-  0.08% )
> > 
> > > My Ivy Bridge EX (4*15*2) has a ~78% improvement in pagefault throughput:
> > > 
> > > PRE:
> > >        105,789,078      page-faults                 ( +-  2.24% )
> > >
> > > POST:
> > >        187,751,767      page-faults                 ( +-  2.24% )
> > 
> > I guess the 'PRE' and 'POST' numbers should be flipped around?
> 
> Nope, its the number of page-faults serviced in a fixed amount of time
> (60 seconds), therefore higher is better.

Ah, okay!

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/