[PATCH] GPU-DRM-nouveau: Deletion of unnecessary checks before two function calls
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Wed Oct 22 2014 - 09:45:22 EST
A semantic patch approach was proposed with the subject "[PATCH with
Coccinelle?] Deletion of unnecessary checks before specific function calls"
on 2014-03-05.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/5/344
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.coccinelle/3513/
This patch pattern application was repeated with the help of the software
"Coccinelle 1.0.0-rc22" on the source files for Linux 3.17.1. An extract
of the automatically generated update suggestions is shown here.
It was determined that the affected source code places call functions
which perform input parameter validation already. It is therefore not
needed that a similar safety check is repeated at the call site.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/handle.c | 3 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 3 +--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/handle.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/handle.c
index a490b80..75d0c2c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/handle.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/handle.c
@@ -219,8 +219,7 @@ nouveau_handle_get_cinst(struct nouveau_object *engctx, u32
cinst)
void
nouveau_handle_put(struct nouveau_handle *handle)
{
- if (handle)
- nouveau_namedb_put(handle);
+ nouveau_namedb_put(handle);
}
int
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
index 5723807..5c29079 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
@@ -512,8 +512,7 @@ nouveau_drm_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
nouveau_vga_fini(drm);
nvif_device_fini(&drm->device);
- if (drm->hdmi_device)
- pci_dev_put(drm->hdmi_device);
+ pci_dev_put(drm->hdmi_device);
nouveau_cli_destroy(&drm->client);
return 0;
}
--
2.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/