Re: [PATCH v5 06/20] perf: Add AUX record

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Oct 22 2014 - 11:07:33 EST


On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 05:18:29PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:45:34PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> >> + /*
> >> + * Records that new data landed in the AUX buffer part.
> >> + *
> >> + * struct {
> >> + * struct perf_event_header header;
> >> + *
> >> + * u64 aux_offset;
> >> + * u64 aux_size;
> >> + * u64 flags;
> >> + * struct sample_id sample_id;
> >> + * };
> >> + */
> >> + PERF_RECORD_AUX = 11,
> >
> > Given the discussion with the ARM people the last time, do we want to
> > add the possibility of a variable data field in this event? Its easy to
> > add now, harder to do later (although not impossible).
>
> Iirc, what they want is to save a once-per-session chunk of data, which
> would be better synthesized by perf record than sent from a pmu driver?
>
> We do something like that with PT right now, perf record looks at pmu's
> sysfs attributes and stores them in some synthesized record.

Right, I just got to that. So I wasn't entirely sure if perf_event_open
time conditions where sufficient for them, if they are then yes that
could work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/