[PATCH 8/8] eeepc-laptop: don't assume get_acpi succeeds
From: Frans Klaver
Date: Wed Oct 22 2014 - 15:13:49 EST
In eeepc_hotk_thaw, we assume that get_acpi() will effectively return a
bool. However, it is possible that get_acpi() returns an error instead.
We should not be writing error values to the ACPI device, even though
it's quite possible that we couldn't contact the ACPI device in the
first place.
Signed-off-by: Frans Klaver <fransklaver@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
index 275a239..14f79ef 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
@@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ static int eeepc_hotk_thaw(struct device *device)
struct eeepc_laptop *eeepc = dev_get_drvdata(device);
if (eeepc->wlan_rfkill) {
- bool wlan;
+ int wlan;
/*
* Work around bios bug - acpi _PTS turns off the wireless led
@@ -919,7 +919,8 @@ static int eeepc_hotk_thaw(struct device *device)
* we should kick it ourselves in case hibernation is aborted.
*/
wlan = get_acpi(eeepc, CM_ASL_WLAN);
- set_acpi(eeepc, CM_ASL_WLAN, wlan);
+ if (wlan >= 0)
+ set_acpi(eeepc, CM_ASL_WLAN, wlan);
}
return 0;
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/