Re: rcu_preempt detected stalls.

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 10/23, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> Your code, your rules.  ;-)

Heh, no. I do not trust my (perverted) taste, I never-never
argue with cosmetic issues ;)

Cough... and at the same time I have a small nit.

> But given this structure, why not use a for() loop replace the
> "goto retry" with an inverted condition and a "return error"?
> Maybe something like the following patch?

Thanks,

Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/