Re: [RFC 0/4] [RFC] slub: Fastpath optimization (especially for RT)

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> In this case, object from cpu1's cpu_cache should be
> different with cpu0's, so allocation would be failed.

That is true for most object pointers unless the value is NULL. Which it
can be. But if this is the only case then the second patch + your approach
would work too.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/