Re: [PATCH 1/5] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for MIPI DSI bus
From: Andrzej Hajda
Date: Mon Oct 27 2014 - 11:20:34 EST
On 10/27/2014 03:17 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:48:26AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index dd31933..476679c 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -3071,6 +3071,13 @@ F: drivers/gpu/vga/
>> F: include/drm/
>> F: include/uapi/drm/
>>
>> +DRM MIPI DSI BUS
>> +M: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> +L: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> +S: Supported
>> +F: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
>> +F: include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>
> I really prefer when common infrastructure like this doesn't get
> maintainer by a vendor. And I care with my intel hat on since we also ahve
> a dsi driver that sooner or later needs to be converted to to this stuff.
>
> Why doesn't the usual model of merging stuff through Dave's tree, or if
> that doesn't work well due to patch depencies, through vendor trees with
> Dave's ack?
The main intention of this patch is to be on CC in case of patches
touching MIPI DSI bus.
I do not want to create separate tree for such small subsystem.
So if such things are not allowed please drop the patch and sorry for
the noise.
Regards
Andrzej
>
> Thanks, Daniel
>
>> +
>> RADEON DRM DRIVERS
>> M: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
>> M: Christian KÃnig <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/