Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] fs: proc: Include cma info in proc/meminfo

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:31:21 +0200 Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 22 2014, Pintu Kumar <pintu.k@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This patch include CMA info (CMATotal, CMAFree) in /proc/meminfo.
> > Currently, in a CMA enabled system, if somebody wants to know the
> > total CMA size declared, there is no way to tell, other than the dmesg
> > or /var/log/messages logs.
> > With this patch we are showing the CMA info as part of meminfo, so that
> > it can be determined at any point of time.
> > This will be populated only when CMA is enabled.
> >
> > Below is the sample output from a ARM based device with RAM:512MB and CMA:16MB.
> >
> > MemTotal:         471172 kB
> > MemFree:          111712 kB
> > MemAvailable:     271172 kB
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > CmaTotal:          16384 kB
> > CmaFree:            6144 kB
> >
> > This patch also fix below checkpatch errors that were found during these changes.
> 
> As already mentioned, this should be in separate patch.

Yes, in theory.  But a couple of little whitespace fixes aren't really
worth a resend.  As long as they don't make the patch harder to read
and to backport I usually just let them through.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/