Re: [PATCH] arm64: amd-seattle: Adding device tree for AMD Seattle platform

[Alexander Graf]

On 27.10.14 15:29, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
> On 10/26/2014 9:08 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>> This option doesn't exist in upstream kernels, does it? Why not just
>>>> >>make it dtb-y?
>>> >
>>> >CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE is being added one hunk above.:)
>> Oops:).
>>
>> I'm not convinced we need a config option just for the sake of
>> compiling a device tree though.
>>
>>
>> Alex
>>
> 
> Eventually, we would add other device driver selections when
> CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE=y. At this point, those drivers are still not ready.

Could you please give me some examples of drivers that would depend on
CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE? I like the current way things work without the need
for such an option, where everything's implemented purely as drivers you
can opt in our out of.

You don't have a CONFIG_ARCH_SB7XX on x86 either, right? ;)


Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/