Re: [PATCH v1 02/10] dt-bindings: Document the standard property "system-power-controller"

[Romain Perier]

If this is possible, that's probably better to drop all these patches
(including poweroff-source) from "next", in this way it will be
possible to re-do things properly from scratch (with the new name).

If you have a look at linux-next the property "poweroff-source" is
already used by tps910 AND act8865, I don't like that (it is not used
yet by dts files). I mean, I don't really want to support
"vendor,system-power-controller", "system-power-controller" and
"poweroff-source" from "of_has_system_power_source" and do a lot of
unclean commits in order to don't break compatibility. Just keep
things simple.

What do you think ?


2014-10-27 18:57 GMT+01:00 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:30:25PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 05:26:36PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > Given that poweroff-source hasn't made it into a released kernel yet we
>> > can probably just kill it off completely can't we?
>
>> please do, then we will never have that commit in Linus' tree to give us
>> nightmares.
>
> Well, the commit isn't a particularly big deal (and got cross-merged
> into another tree already) - if it's convenient to rebase it out we
> probably should but it's also not the end of the world either so long as
> it doesn't appear in a release.  Worst case people adopt it based on the
> list discussions and we check for two properties which also isn't that
> bad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/