Re: [PATCH v5 07/29] nios2: I/O Mapping

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 24 October 2014 16:24:09 Ley Foon Tan wrote:

> +/* PCI is not supported in nios2, set this to 0. */
> +#define IO_SPACE_LIMIT 0
> +
> +extern void outsb(unsigned long addr, const void *buf, int len);
> +extern void outsw(unsigned long addr, const void *buf, int len);
> +extern void outsl(unsigned long addr, const void *buf, int len);
> +extern void insb(unsigned long addr, void *buf, int len);
> +extern void insw(unsigned long addr, void *buf, int len);
> +extern void insl(unsigned long addr, void *buf, int len);
> +#define outsb outsb
> +#define outsw outsw
> +#define outsl outsl
> +#define insb insb
> +#define insw insw
> +#define insl insl

You don't have inb/outb, so you shouldn't have these either.

> +/*
> + * PCI is not enabled in nios2. Provide dummy implementation to get 'allyesconfig'
> + * to build successfully.
> + */
> +#define inb(addr)	({ 0; })
> +#define inw(addr)	({ 0; })
> +#define inl(addr)	({ 0; })
> +#define outb(x, addr)	do { } while (0)
> +#define outw(x, addr)	do { } while (0)
> +#define outl(x, addr)	do { } while (0)

What fails if you take these out?

> +
> +/* Use "Duff's Device" to unroll the loops. */
> +#define __IO_OUT_LOOP(a, b, l)				\
> +	do {						\
> +		if (l > 0) {				\
> +			int _n = (l + 7) / 8;		\
> +			switch (l % 8) {		\
> +			case 0:				\
> +				do {			\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +			case 7:				\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +			case 6:				\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +			case 5:				\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +			case 4:				\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +			case 3:				\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +			case 2:				\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +			case 1:				\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +				} while (--_n > 0);	\
> +			}				\
> +		}					\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +#define __IO_IN_LOOP(a, b, l)				\
> +	do {						\
> +		if (l > 0) {				\
> +			int _n = (l + 7) / 8;		\
> +			switch (l % 8) {		\
> +			case 0:				\
> +				do {			\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +			case 7:				\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +			case 6:				\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +			case 5:				\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +			case 4:				\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +			case 3:				\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +			case 2:				\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +			case 1:				\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +				} while (--_n > 0);	\
> +			}				\
> +		}					\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +#else /* __IO_USE_DUFFS */
> +
> +/* Use simple loops. */
> +#define __IO_OUT_LOOP(a, b, l)				\
> +	do {						\
> +		while (l--)				\
> +			*a = *b++;			\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +#define __IO_IN_LOOP(a, b, l)				\
> +	do {						\
> +		while (l--)				\
> +			*b++ = *a;			\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +#endif /* __IO_USE_DUFFS */
> +
> +void outsb(unsigned long addr, const void *buf, int len)
> +{
> +	volatile unsigned char *ap = (volatile unsigned char *)addr;
> +	unsigned char *bp = (unsigned char *)buf;
> +	__IO_OUT_LOOP(ap, bp, len);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(outsb);
> +
> +void outsw(unsigned long addr, const void *buf, int len)
> +{
> +	volatile unsigned short *ap = (volatile unsigned short *)addr;
> +	unsigned short *bp = (unsigned short *)buf;
> +	__IO_OUT_LOOP(ap, bp, len);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(outsw);

This implementation makes no sense, so definitely remove them.


	Arnd

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/