Re: [PATCH 04/16] perf tools: Add a thread stack for synthesizing call chains

[Jiri Olsa]

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:45:12PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:

SNIP

>  };
>  
> +enum {
> +	PERF_FLAG_BRANCH		= 1ULL << 0,
> +	PERF_FLAG_CALL			= 1ULL << 1,
> +	PERF_FLAG_RETURN		= 1ULL << 2,
> +	PERF_FLAG_CONDITIONAL		= 1ULL << 3,
> +	PERF_FLAG_SYSCALLRET		= 1ULL << 4,
> +	PERF_FLAG_ASYNC			= 1ULL << 5,
> +	PERF_FLAG_INTERRUPT		= 1ULL << 6,
> +	PERF_FLAG_TX_ABORT		= 1ULL << 7,
> +	PERF_FLAG_TRACE_BEGIN		= 1ULL << 8,
> +	PERF_FLAG_TRACE_END		= 1ULL << 9,
> +	PERF_FLAG_IN_TX			= 1ULL << 10,
> +};
> +
> +#define PERF_BRANCH_MASK	(\
> +	PERF_FLAG_BRANCH	|\
> +	PERF_FLAG_CALL		|\
> +	PERF_FLAG_RETURN	|\
> +	PERF_FLAG_CONDITIONAL	|\
> +	PERF_FLAG_SYSCALLRET	|\
> +	PERF_FLAG_ASYNC		|\
> +	PERF_FLAG_INTERRUPT	|\
> +	PERF_FLAG_TX_ABORT	|\
> +	PERF_FLAG_TRACE_BEGIN	|\
> +	PERF_FLAG_TRACE_END)

PERF_FLAG_ prefix seems too generic,

should it be something like PERF_BRANCH_FLAG__* ?


jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/