Re: [GIT PULL 00/32] perf/core improvements and fixes

[Ingo Molnar]

* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hi Ingo,
> 
> 	Please consider pulling,
> 
> - Arnaldo
> 
> The following changes since commit e53f6124af6516cee3063a3072767ee2717ff343:
> 
>   Merge tag 'perf-urgent-for-mingo' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux into perf/urgent (2014-10-24 09:46:36 +0200)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git tags/perf-core-for-mingo
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to 8eeeb304ea2714962b10873f72aa7c5e24f5265f:
> 
>   perf probe: Add --quiet option to suppress output result message (2014-10-27 17:16:34 -0200)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> perf/core improvements and fixes:
> 
> User visible:
> 
> * 'perf probe' --demangle typo fix and a new --quiet option (Masami Hiramatsu)

So the fix part would be nice to have for perf/urgent I suspect?

> * Fix report -F (abort, in_tx, mispredict, etc) segfaults for sample.data files
>   without branch info (Jiri Olsa)

Ditto.

> * Don't open the DWARF info multiple times, keeping instead a dwfl handle
>   in struct dso, greatly speeding up 'perf report' on powerpc. (Sukadev Bhattiprolu)
> 
> * Add patch that should have went in a previous patchkit to use global cache
>   provided by libunwind (Namhyung Kim)

Given that this is already upstream, is this a required fix for 
perf/urgent or can it wait and go into perf/core?

And then the remaining bits should be based on the urgent tree.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/