Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] regulator: max77686: Add suspend disable for some LDOs

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Åro, 2014-10-29 at 10:01 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:20:13AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On wto, 2014-10-28 at 22:31 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > This looks wrong, you're using the regular enable operation as suspend
> > > enable.  How does that work without disrupting the current runtime
> > > state?
> 
> > Currently it shouldn't disrupt state of regulator because during runtime
> > it may only be only: on (0x3) or off (0x0). Suspend enable in max77686
> > writes 0x3 to the register which means - always on.
> 
> > If regulator was disabled before suspend then it has to be enabled
> > during suspend_enable() call which is exactly what max77686_enable does.
> > If it was enabled then nothing happens.
> 
> No, this isn't suspend enable control - this is normal, standard enable
> control and the device has no suspend enable control.

You mean that for such regulator the driver shouldn't implement
suspend_enable()?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/