Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / Domains: Extract code to power off/on a PM domain

[Ulf Hansson]

On 23 October 2014 14:12, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> PM domains are powered on/off from various places. Some callers do
> latency measurements, others don't. Consolidate using two helper
> functions, which always measure the latencies, and update the stored
> latencies when needed.
>
> Other minor changes:
>   - Use pr_warn() instead of pr_warning(),
>   - There's no need to check genpd->name, %s handles NULL pointers fine,
>   - Make the warning format strings identical, to save memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>

Though, some minor thoughts below.

> ---
>  drivers/base/power/domain.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index 28d6e8bf746c4683..7b2007be51188ff8 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -151,6 +151,59 @@ static void genpd_recalc_cpu_exit_latency(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>         genpd->cpuidle_data->idle_state->exit_latency = usecs64;
>  }
>
> +static int do_genpd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)

Should we try to agree on the prefixes of the function names in genpd?
Currently there are a mix of them.

May I suggest we try to stick to this:

Exported functions:
pm_genpd_*
_pm_genpd_*
__pm_genpd_*

Static functions:
genpd_*
_genpd_*
__genpd_*

What do you think? Do you have any better suggestions?

Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/