Am 29.10.2014 um 02:33 schrieb Stephen Warren:
On 10/27/2014 06:52 PM, Matthias Klein wrote:Yes, I will work on such a patchset.
The model B and B+ differ in the GPIO lines for ACT and PWR led.This new file is almost identical to bcm2835-rpi.dts. Perhaps we can use
The PWR led on the B+ model is active low.
some include files to share the common portions so they aren't
duplicated. Roughly:
* Move all the common content from bcm2835-rpi.dts into bcm2835-rpi.dtsi.
* Update bcm2835-rpi.dts to include bcm2835-rpi.dtsi to get all the
common parts, and add the few lines of differences.
* Update this patch similarly.
Does that make sense?
A couple changes to this patch and the existing bcm2835-rpi.dts might
reduce the differences even further, leading to more common code in
bcm2835-rpi.dtsi:
- Add the PWR LED to bcm2835-rpi-b.dts, if appropriate.
- Add the I2S pinmux settings for B+ too.
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-b-plus.dts...
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-b-plus.dts
+&mmc {That label doesn't exist; it should be &sdhci. Consequently:
Sorry, I based my patch on the wrong tree. I used
https://github.com/pietrushnic/rpi-dt-linux/tree/rpi-3.17.y which
contains non upstream commits.
Which tree should I use in general for work on the BCM2835? Is
linux-next the right tree?