Re: [PATCH v3] rtc: omap: add support for pmic_power_en

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:50:05 +0100 Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 09:36:33AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:40:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:09:28 +0100 Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > But in general, how do you want to handle updates to a single patch in a
> > series you already have in your tree? Do you prefer a proper
> > incremental-fix patch (with commit message), just an updated single
> > patch, or a resend of the whole series?
> 
> How should I best send the updated patch? Can you just replace the
> current three incremental patches:
> 
> 	rtc-omap-add-support-for-pmic_power_en.patch
> 	rtc-omap-add-support-for-pmic_power_en-v3.patch
> 	rtc-omap-add-support-for-pmic_power_en-v3-fix.patch
> 
> that you have in your tree, with a single new v4 which adds a more
> elaborate comment?

Yep, that works.  I'll almost always turn the new patch into an
incremental, mainly so that I (and others) can see what was changed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/