Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: Add a chapter on conditional compilation

[Josh Triplett]

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:12:49PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Document several common practices and conventions regarding conditional
> > compilation, most notably the preference for ifdefs in headers rather
> > than .c files.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> > +If you have a function or variable which may potentially go unused in a
> > +particular configuration, and the compiler would warn about its definition
> > +going unused, mark the definition as __maybe_unused rather than wrapping it in
> > +a preprocessor conditional.  (However, if a function or variable *always* goes
> > +unused, delete it.)
> 
> Personally, I don't like __maybe_unused. Once it's there, the compiler
> will stop warning about it, even if it really becomes unused.

True.  It's a tradeoff between getting the compiler to warn about unused
code to allow removing it, and putting #ifdefs in .c files.  However,
in previous patch discussions, developers seem to come down pretty
consistently on the side of "don't put #ifdefs in .c files".

> Apart from that:
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/