Re: [RFA][PATCH 1/8] seq_file: Rename seq_overflow() to seq_has_overflowed() and make public

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:08:36 -0700
Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 17:56 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > +A true return from seq_has_overflowed means that the seq_file buffer is full
> > +and further output will be discarded.
> 
> Perhaps the description is a bit unclear here.
> 
> Doesn't a return of true to seq_has_overflowed mean that
> more characters have already been written than the buffer
> can accept?
> 

Actually, right now the comment is correct and the name is misleading.
But I have a patch that will make the comment incorrect (and will be
fixed) and the name correct.

But since seq_has_overflowed() is to be used throughout the kernel, I
didn't want to have to go do patches all over again for a temporary
misnomer.

In other words, I'm going to change the function to really return only
if it did overflow and not just be full. But that's another patch set
to come.

I can update the change log and comment to state what will happen in
the future.

Thanks,

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/