Re: net: fec: fix regression on i.MX28 introduced by rx_copybreak support
From: Lothar WaÃmann
Date: Thu Oct 30 2014 - 02:51:30 EST
Hi,
David Miller wrote:
> From: Lothar WaÃmann <LW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:22:55 +0100
>
> > Changes wrt. v1:
> > - added some cleanup patches
> > - simplify handling of 'quirks' flags as suggested by Russell King.
> > - remove DIV_ROUND_UP() from byte swapping loop as suggested by
> > Eric Dumazet
> >
> > Changes wrt. v2:
> > - rebased against next-20141028
> > - added some more cleanups in fec.h
> > - removed unused return value from swap_buffer()
> > - fixed messed swab32s() call in swap_buffer2()
> > - fixed messed up setup of fep->quirks
> >
>
> It is not appropriate to mix cleanups and bonafide bug fixes.
>
> I want to see only bug fixes targetted at 'net'. You can later
> submit the cleanups to 'net-next'.
>
OK.
> Also, I don't thnk your DIV_ROUND_UP() eliminate for the loop
> in swap_buffer() is valid. The whole point is that the current
> code handles buffers which have a length which is not a multiple
> of 4 properly, after your change it will no longer do so.
>
Do you really think so?
Lothar WaÃmann
--
___________________________________________________________
Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | PascalstraÃe 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
GeschÃftsfÃhrer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996
www.karo-electronics.de | info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
___________________________________________________________
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/