Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] sched/rt: check if curr can be pushed/pulled somewhere else in advance
From: Kirill Tkhai
Date: Thu Oct 30 2014 - 11:01:17 EST
Hi,
Ð ÐÑ, 30/10/2014 Ð 22:16 +0800, Wanpeng Li ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> This patch checks if current can be pushed/pulled somewhere else
> in advance to make logic clear, the same behavior as rt class.
>
> - If current can't be migrated, useless to reschedule, let's hope
> task can move out.
> - If task is migratable, so let's not schedule it and see if it
> can be pushed or pulled somewhere else.
No functional changes, are they? So I'd suggest to change subject
on something connected with "cleanup".
Also, the description confuses. Please, write that code was cleaned
up, and that comments were added.
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/sched/rt.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index d024e6c..a0b51aa 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -1351,16 +1351,22 @@ out:
>
> static void check_preempt_equal_prio(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - if (rq->curr->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
> + /*
> + * Current can't be migrated, useless to reschedule,
> + * let's hope p can move out.
> + */
> + if (rq->curr->nr_cpus_allowed == 1 ||
> + !cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->curr, NULL))
> return;
All conditions of multi-line if() should be aligned the same:
+ if (rq->curr->nr_cpus_allowed == 1 ||
+ !cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->curr, NULL))
>
> + /*
> + * p is migratable, so let's not schedule it and
> + * see if it is pushed or pulled somewhere else.
> + */
> if (p->nr_cpus_allowed != 1
> && cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, p, NULL))
> return;
>
> - if (!cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->curr, NULL))
> - return;
> -
> /*
> * There appears to be other cpus that can accept
> * current and none to run 'p', so lets reschedule
Thanks,
Kirill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/