Re: [RFC patch] mm: hugetlb: fix __unmap_hugepage_range

[Michal Hocko]

[CCing people involved in 24669e58477e2]

On Fri 31-10-14 12:22:12, Hillf Danton wrote:
> First, after flushing TLB, we have no need to scan pte from start again.
> Second, before bail out loop, the address is forwarded one step.

I can imagine a more comprehensive wording here. It is not immediately
clear whether this is just an optimization or a bug fix as well
(especially the second part).

Anyway the optimization looks good to me.

> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>

> ---
> 
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c	Fri Oct 31 11:47:25 2014
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c	Fri Oct 31 11:52:42 2014
> @@ -2641,8 +2641,9 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_g
>  
>  	tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma);
>  	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, mmun_start, mmun_end);
> +	address = start;
>  again:
> -	for (address = start; address < end; address += sz) {
> +	for (; address < end; address += sz) {
>  		ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, address);
>  		if (!ptep)
>  			continue;
> @@ -2689,6 +2690,7 @@ again:
>  		page_remove_rmap(page);
>  		force_flush = !__tlb_remove_page(tlb, page);
>  		if (force_flush) {
> +			address += sz;
>  			spin_unlock(ptl);
>  			break;
>  		}
> --
> 
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/