Re: [PATCH] x86, cpu: trivial printk formatting fixes

[Borislav Petkov]

On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 03:44:56PM +0000, Steven Honeyman wrote:
> A 2 line printk makes dmesg output messy, because the second line does not get a timestamp.
> For example:
> 
> [    0.012863] CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM1)
> [    0.012869] Last level iTLB entries: 4KB 1024, 2MB 1024, 4MB 1024
> Last level dTLB entries: 4KB 1024, 2MB 1024, 4MB 1024, 1GB 4
> [    0.012958] Freeing SMP alternatives memory: 28K (ffffffff81d86000 - ffffffff81d8d000)
> [    0.014961] dmar: Host address width 39

It looks just fine here, albeit with repeated timestamp:

$ dmesg | grep -E "[id]TLB"
[    0.269607] Last level iTLB entries: 4KB 512, 2MB 1024, 4MB 512
[    0.269607] Last level dTLB entries: 4KB 1024, 2MB 1024, 4MB 512, 1GB 0

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/