Re: [PATCH v8 07/10] sched: replace capacity_factor by usage

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 09:47:29AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> @@ -6414,11 +6399,12 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s
>  	 */
>  	if (busiest->group_type == group_overloaded &&
>  	    local->group_type   == group_overloaded) {
> -		load_above_capacity =
> -			(busiest->sum_nr_running - busiest->group_capacity_factor);
> -
> -		load_above_capacity *= (SCHED_LOAD_SCALE * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE);
> -		load_above_capacity /= busiest->group_capacity;
> +		load_above_capacity = busiest->sum_nr_running *
> +					SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
> +		if (load_above_capacity > busiest->group_capacity)
> +			load_above_capacity -= busiest->group_capacity;
> +		else
> +			load_above_capacity = ~0UL;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*

It seems to me we no longer have need to assume each task contributes
SCHED_LOAD_SCALE, do we?

But as it stands I tihnk this patch already does too much -- it could do
with a splitting, but let me stare at is a wee bit more.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/