Re: [RFD] perf syscall error handling

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 02:25:48PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:

> The way that peterz suggested, i.e. returning information about which
> perf_event_attr and which of the parameters was invalid/had issues could
> help with fallbacking/capability querying, i.e. tooling may want to use
> some features if available automagically, fallbacking to something else
> when that fails.
> 
> We already do that to some degree in various cases, but for some if the
> only way that becomes available to disambiguate some EINVAL return is a
> string, code will start having strcmps :-\

OK, so how about we do both, the offset+mask for the tools and the
string for the humans?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/