Re: [PATCH 03/17] irqchip: irq-armada-370-xp: use proper return value for ->set_affinity()

[Gregory CLEMENT]

Hi Thomas,

On 24/10/2014 13:59, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> The ->set_affinity() hook of 'struct irq_chip' is supposed to return
> one of IRQ_SET_MASK_OK or IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY. However, the code
> currently simply returns 0. This patch fixes that by using
> IRQ_SET_MASK_OK, which tells the IRQ core that it is responsible for
> updating irq_data.affinity.

It seems that this driver is not the only one to return 0 instead of
IRQ_SET_MASK_OK in the >set_affinity(). I found also irq-xtensa-mx.c,
irq-metag.c and irq-metag-ext.c.


> 
> Note that this patch does not cause any change to the compiled code,
> as IRQ_SET_MASK_OK has the value 0. This is therefore just a simple
> cleanup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Thanks,

Gregory

-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/