Re: [PATCH perf/core 0/6] perf-probe: Bugfix and add new options for cache
From: Namhyung Kim
Date: Tue Nov 04 2014 - 00:03:19 EST
Hi Arnaldo and Masami,
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 14:19:00 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> [root@zoo ~]# perf buildid-cache --hell
> Error: unknown option `hell'
>
> usage: perf buildid-cache [<options>]
>
> -a, --add <file list>
> file(s) to add
> -k, --kcore <file> kcore file to add
> -r, --remove <file list>
> file(s) to remove
> -M, --missing <file> to find missing build ids in the cache
> -f, --force don't complain, do it
> -u, --update <file list>
> file(s) to update
> -v, --verbose be more verbose
>
> [root@zoo ~]#
>
> Already has support for yet another of content: kcore files, its just a matter of adding
> one more:
>
> perf buildid-cache --probe
But it deals with binaries, and what we need is probe points. So maybe
it's worth add a new command like:
perf probe-cache [add|del|enable|disable] [<options>] [<path>|<build-id>] <spec>...
or perf probe-cache list [<options>]
This way we can handle both of kprobes and uprobes (so SDTs). What do
you think?
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/