Re: [PATCH 1/4] inet: Add skb_copy_datagram_iter

From: Herbert Xu
Date: Tue Nov 04 2014 - 09:43:14 EST


On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:32:00PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>
> Too noisy, IMO. How about skb_copy_datagram_msg() first? The fewer
> places have to even think of iovec or iov_iter, the better...

We have places like tcp ucopy and tun that do not have msghdr.
So doing skb_copy_datagram_msg means that we'd have to create
a fake msghdr wrapper around them. The point is not everything
comes in via sendmsg/recvmsg.

What is your motivation for hiding iov/iov_iter? Do you plan to
change their API at some future point?

Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/