Re: [RFA][PATCH 2/8] netfilter: Remove return values for print_conntrack callbacks

[Joe Perches]

On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 09:31 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:22:36 +0100
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:05:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:04 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > [ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
> > > Can any of the netfilter folks give me an Acked-by for this?
> > If Florian's concern were addressed, then:
> Yeah, the change he mentioned was done is 3/8. As that was written by
> Joe Perches, I did some work that he missed and put it before his
> patch, which showed a discrepancy between the two functions. After all
> patches are applied, it should be consistent to his liking.

I think seq_has_overflowed does not need
to be used after every seq_<put/print> call.

It interrupts reading code flow and just
isn't alll that necessary as every operation
before it will be redone anyway.

It should be used before or after a large
blocks though.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/