Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Tue Nov 04 2014 - 10:59:58 EST


On Tuesday, November 04, 2014 03:49:50 PM Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 00:10:20 +0200
> , "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 11:08:59 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > This is version 6 of the unified device properties interface patchset.
> > >
> > > The original cover letter from Mika is here:
> > >
> > > http://marc.info/?l=devicetree&m=141087052200600&w=4
> > >
> > > and my cover letters for previous iterations are at:
> > >
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=141212903816560&w=4
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141354745011569&w=4
> > >
> > > There are a few changes with respect to v5 and the affected patches are
> > > [02-03/12] and [09-12/12]. The remaining ones have not been modified.
> > >
> > > Most importantly, requesting the first element of a list (package) property
> > > from _DSD is now equivalent to accessing a single-value property of the
> > > same type, so device_property_read_u8(dev, pname, val) will now be equivalent
> > > to device_property_read_u8_array(dev, pname, val, 1), for example.
> > > Consequently, this _DSD definition:
> > >
> > > Name (_DSD, Package () {
> > > ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> > > Package () {
> > > Package () {"blah", "A string"},
> > > }
> > > })
> > >
> > > can be used instead of
> > >
> > > Name (_DSD, Package () {
> > > ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> > > Package () {
> > > Package () {"blah", Package () {"A string"}},
> > > }
> > > })
> > >
> > > and the code will be able to retrieve the property value from the both of
> > > them just fine.
> > >
> > > This means, among other things, that accessors for single-value properties
> > > can be implemented in terms of the analogous "array" property accessors
> > > which allows the code size to be reduced somewhat.
> > >
> > > Patches [02/12] and [09/12] have been modified to achieve that and patch
> > > [03/12] have been modified accordingly for the "compatible" property in
> > > _DSD to behave in an analogous way. Additionally, the bodies of the
> > > numerical property accessors in patches [02/12] and [09/12] are now
> > > generated using macros (string property accessors have slightly different
> > > rules and are simply open coded for that reason).
> > >
> > > Patch [10/12] has been modified to drop function arguments that happened to
> > > have the same values for both of the current users of those functions and
> > > patches [11-12/12] have been modified to take that change into account. If
> > > the code in question needs to be made more complex in the future, there
> > > should not be any problems with that.
> > >
> > > Due to the nature of the changes I have retained all ACKs except for the
> > > Grant's Reviewed-by on patch [03/12] (if that had been Acked-by, I would have
> > > retained it too, but that didn't feel appropriate for the "reviewed by" thing
> > > to me). If any of you think that the ACKs are not applicable any more, please
> > > let me know and I'll drop them.
> > >
> > > Finally, many thanks to Mika for testing the series on MinnowBoard 1 and
> > > MinnowBoard Max. In case anybody else would like to test it, it is available
> > > from the device-properties branch of the linux-pm.git tree:
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git device-properties
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> >
> > Crickets ...
> >
> > OK, so I'm taking the lack of comments as the lack of objections and I'm already
> > getting merge conflicts for this series. Moreover, we already have done some
> > work on top of it.
> >
> > So, if there still are no comments by Sunday evening, I'll add this series to
> > my linux-next branch with 3.19-rc1 as the target.
>
> Aside from the comments I've made elsewhere, you can add my acked by for the whole series.
>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/